And if that of “losses” appears to be an overly aligned argument, a sort of blackmail with which the European institutions would keep the leash on member states short, then we must evaluate the many advantages of EU membership.
Advantages that, it is true, Europe itself does not seem to be able to exploit (for reasons of “poor” marketing), but which affect the most varied areas: from that of national security, to that of economic advantages, from that of the freedom granted to all to circulate, work and circulate their own services and capital, from that of the antitrust fight to that of the protection of citizens’ rights. Finally, importance is to be attributed to the fact that most of the political realities from which greater support for Brexit has come are framed in the area of populism and demagogy, and exploit disinformation as a weapon of political propaganda.
“The third split, perhaps the most relevant, is that between rich and poor. Only 38 percent of those who call themselves professionals or managers want a divorce from Brussels, compared to 52 percent of blue-collar workers and the unemployed (and among them only 31 per cent would like to continue the European marriage; many do not know or do not answer.) It is not necessary to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that the “Europe problem” is primarily an English problem, not a British problem in general, and that it is above all a problem of the British who have suffered most from the economic crisis of the last eight years. In this social group, Euroscepticism – which has always existed in Great Britain and which Margaret Thatcher was the spokesperson for in the 1980s – was fueled by a vision of free movement of people in Europe as a threat to “our” jobs and a risk to the health and social security system, which would be squeezed by the so-called benefit tourists. “( from the article dated 13/06/2016, published in international. it).
“It is true that many of those who voted to leave Europe were convinced that in the end” staying “would prevail, and they voted to send a strong signal, certainly not to obtain that outcome. it was for Scottish independence a year ago.
Before writing your Brexit theme, we recommend that you make a lineup that will help you tidy up your ideas and not go off topic.
Use the first few lines of your theme as an introduction, and then expose the topic and deepen it critically, until you draw your own conclusions. Therefore:
How to approach the Brexit topic? How to start writing about this topic? Follow the order that we indicate below:
Depending on your taste, you can choose to refer to a particular event inherent to the topic, or literally “merge” the introduction and presentation of the topic, using the definition of the “Brexit” phenomenon as an introduction to the central part of the text (third step of the ladder). Also choose the style to use well: if you proceed with short sentences, you will emphasize the more emotional aspect; with longer periods, however, you will focus on the reasoning.
Now you have to pick up the bad sheet with the small questionnaire. Use it to highlight the misinformation that often revolves around the phenomenon, but which you, thanks to valid critical insights, are about to overcome. The important thing is to make the reader understand how you will talk about this phenomenon: be clear about the cut you want to give.
Of course, you are free to express all the ideas you want, but you must always rely on statistical data and articles: you must avoid yes because yes and no why not. Begin to explore the causes of the phenomenon you are examining. How is Europe behaving? Within the articles you find in the comments, you can find many ways to correctly interpret the phenomenon: remember to mention them. Once you have framed the phenomenon from many points of view, propose solutions that we have common sense: that is, that they are feasible.
You are now at the conclusions. Read your text well. What solutions have you proposed to positively affect this phenomenon? The conclusions and solutions largely coincide. Then then close by indicating a way forward both for the institutions and for ordinary citizens.
Maturity 2020: news, advice and updates for 500 thousand graduates. Subscribe to the social channels of Studenti.it maturity:
Brexit and Erasmus: what are the consequences given the results of the Referendum? This is explained to us by the director of the Indire Erasmus + National Agency, Flaminio Galli
Theme on the Treaties of Rome: outline by theme or short essay on the European Union with introduction, development and conclusion as well as food for thought and documents
Erasmus +, students worried about the post-Brexit. After the vote on January 8 in London, the scenarios for the university exchange could change
Documents, certificates and language levels n